Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 21:31:17 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> Cc: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c Message-ID: <25785.1050175877@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:17:41 PDT." <0a2201c30128$30e43e50$52557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <0a2201c30128$30e43e50$52557f42@errno.com>, "Sam Leffler" writes: >> Second, I have discussed this particular change with ken@, >> who as you correctly point out is the maintainer, and he >> agreed that the function was unused. >> > >Then why wasn't ken@ referenced in your commit msg? Because I forgot. (See my .sig) >> So I really don't know why or what compelled you to attack me here, >> whatever it was: please try to control it better in the future. > >Given your past history of summarily axing and/or modifying code w/o >consulting folks I can see why someone might respond as Nate did. I could maybe be persuaded that somebody might respond. I certainly cannot see why one would respond "as Nate did". At the very least I'd expect them to check the basic facts first. And as I have understood it, core@ would expect them to keep a a significantly less confrontational style than Nate did. But maybe that's just me... Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25785.1050175877>