From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 11 08:50:04 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F3F16A405
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 May 2007 08:50:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B7D13C480
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 11 May 2007 08:50:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l4B8o4dh027757
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:50:04 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l4B8o35r027756;
	Fri, 11 May 2007 08:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Resent-Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:50:03 GMT
Resent-Message-Id: <200705110850.l4B8o35r027756@freefall.freebsd.org>
Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org,
	Mikael Vidstedt<mikael.vidstedt@bea.com>
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C15E16A404
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Fri, 11 May 2007 08:43:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [69.147.83.33])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCDA13C457
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Fri, 11 May 2007 08:43:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4B8heiX083245
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 11 May 2007 08:43:40 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l4B8cdMi082221;
	Fri, 11 May 2007 08:38:39 GMT (envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <200705110838.l4B8cdMi082221@www.freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:38:39 GMT
From: Mikael Vidstedt<mikael.vidstedt@bea.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.0
Cc: 
Subject: misc/112591: Non-monitored locks are dummy-implemented
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:50:04 -0000


>Number:         112591
>Category:       misc
>Synopsis:       Non-monitored locks are dummy-implemented
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri May 11 08:50:03 GMT 2007
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Mikael Vidstedt
>Release:        6.2
>Organization:
BEA Systems, Inc.
>Environment:
FreeBSD  6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 10:40:27 UTC 2007     root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

>Description:
As far as I can tell, the implementation of the NLMPROC4_NM_LOCK RPC procedure is not correctly implemented. It looks like it always returns "granted" regardless of the actual locking state of the file handle.

If a full implementation is not possible, I would at least say that returning "denied" is a better implementation, since "granted" may lead to data corruption.
>How-To-Repeat:
-
>Fix:
-
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: