From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 15 08:15:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B337916A4B3; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA4E43F75; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:15:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9FFFkgI038599; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 19:15:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h9FFFjQD038598; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 19:15:45 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 19:15:43 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20031015151542.GA38522@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20031015112920.GA36404@nagual.pp.ru> <20031015132551.GA94612@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20031015133634.GA37556@nagual.pp.ru> <20031015143545.GA1667@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031015143545.GA1667@gothmog.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: doc@freebsd.org cc: developers@freebsd.org cc: Wilko Bulte Subject: Re: hiding e-mail adresses needed badly X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:15:54 -0000 On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 17:35:45 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Once an email address has been public it's always public. You can't > stop spammers from sharing addresses they harvested already by hiding > those addresses now. They already have them. I mean new spammers and their harvesters, not old ones. > Bearing this in mind, it's obvious why hiding your address now won't > solve your immediate spam problem. It might help in avoiding similar > troubles of future subscribers, but I doubt it will prevent it altogether. I solve immediate spam problem in different ways. Suggesting that I mean to reduce not immediate but future problems. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/