From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 22 22:52:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 79FFE16A4D1; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:52:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5839443D68; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:52:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bmilekic@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (bmilekic@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i5MMqDe5026329;	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:52:13 GMT
	(envelope-from bmilekic@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from bmilekic@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5MMqD4P026328;
	Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:52:13 GMT
	(envelope-from bmilekic)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:52:13 +0000
From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@FreeBSD.org>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Message-ID: <20040622225213.GA26151@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ithread priority question...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:52:29 -0000


Julian Elischer wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, John Baldwin wrote:
...
>> That was the intention.  One question though, if the ithreads aren't on the
>> system run queues then which run queues are they on?
>
>aren't they run from the interupt?

  Not always.  They have to be put on a runqueue if they block on a
  mutex, say.

  -Bosko