From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 10:57:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D83106564A for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD7D8FC0C for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OimVq-0005MZ-G1 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:56:54 +0200 Received: from 91.205.197.96 ([91.205.197.96]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:56:54 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by 91.205.197.96 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:56:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 29 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.205.197.96 User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.269 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:0000005D Subject: PRs for Typo3 time out X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:57:02 -0000 Hi, in the past I created a few PRs with patches for important security updates for typo3. Unfortunately they all timed out. 10 days ago I created a new one: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149236 I guess it will also time out. Now, there is another update: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=149493 I also expect it to time out. What is the time GNATS is waiting for feedback of the maintainer? Does it make a difference if importance and/or severity are raised? IMHO it is a problem if important security fixes are approved only after a 14-day-or-more timeout. Are there mechanisms to avoid such a delay? Helmut -- No Swen today, my love has gone away My mailbox stands for lorn, a symbol of the dawn