From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 2 14:18:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411A837B4D7; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:18:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eA2MHwU26466; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:17:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Mike Smith Cc: "Akinori MUSHA" , stable@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: i386/20379 In-Reply-To: Message from Mike Smith of "Thu, 02 Nov 2000 14:14:45 PST." <200011022214.eA2MEjF01406@mass.osd.bsdi.com> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 14:17:58 -0800 Message-ID: <26463.973203478@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On the other hand, there *is* an easy workaround to turn them off, so in > the worst case we would have an escape route. > > Jordan, what's your feeling on this? I don't have a 450GX board to test > with. 8( I feel it looks like a small but smelly hack and I also have bad feelings about it. :) What's this "easy workaround to turn them off" you're alluding to? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message