From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Jul 19 13:42:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3993837B400 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFDA43E3B for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0472.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.199.217] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17VeZc-00018I-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:42:00 -0700 Message-ID: <3D38796A.2F0E3FF5@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:41:14 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tzouris,M" Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MSc student, needs help from OS contributor! References: <09EF96A44C0A7A4FB1D51C1B9DBF9B37468483@ExF2.pc.lse.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Tzouris,M" wrote: > I have uploaded an online questionnaire (http://www.lse-students.ac.uk/tzouris/oss/questionnaire.htm > ) on the School's site, and I am searching for Open Source contributors that might be interested in answering it. The questionnaire is designed in a way that It won't require more than 10 minutes to be answered. > > If you are a contributor, you are kindly requested to spend 10 minutes on filling in this questionnaire http://www.lse-students.ac.uk/tzouris/oss/questionnaire.htm > . My MPhil/PhD which is commencing in the upcoming October, will be based on my current research. So as you can understand your help is really important to me. Some of your questions are badly formed. Question #9 is the most aggregious of these, in that it assumes two reasons for participation, and forces the answerer to place themselves into one of the two available categories. Several other questions also contain false dichotomies and assumptions, and therefore have no correct answer (e.g. section B, the 5-6/7-8 split and 11's mistaken assumption of motivation). I realize that the intent of an economics student is to define things in terms of compensation for effort, but assuming a direct reward is a bit naieve (e.g. "a reward is to gt you to do something you would not otherwise do, except for the reward" -- George Carlin). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message