From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 7 15:11:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA40316A4CE; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 15:11:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prisma.rainbow-runner.nl (c7057.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.7.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927B543D48; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 15:11:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: by prisma.rainbow-runner.nl (Postfix, from userid 2006) id CED00208A; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 17:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (heater.rainbow-runner.nl [192.168.1.5]) by prisma.rainbow-runner.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC2E2071; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 17:08:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Koop Mast To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1089165749.77519.42.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <200407070142.i671gGCh097568@freefall.freebsd.org> <1089164894.77519.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200407062057.57340.linimon@lonesome.com> <1089165749.77519.42.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:10:33 +0000 Message-Id: <1089213033.1405.1.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.90FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on prisma.rainbow-runner.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: Mark Linimon cc: Joseph Koshy cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/68747: [patch] upgrade print/freetype2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:11:14 -0000 On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 22:02 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 21:57, Mark Linimon wrote: > > May I suggest that we hold off on this for a few days while we try to > > work on the regression testing for the meta-X-upgrade stuff? It's just > > one more variable and there are plenty already :-) > > Yeah, no problem. I have to verify this myself. Like I said, 2.1.8 > would have earned me much flamage. > > Joe Font look a little diffrent with 2.1.9 than with the freetype 2.1.7 but I like them. But the problem is that de freetype people have changed some api's, somewhere in 2.1.8 and 2.1.9. Gnome and Xorg build fine with the new freetype but mozilla doesn't, because it uses those changed api's. See: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234035 With the patch in the bugreport mozilla build past the problem, but it breaks later on. From a quick look its the same api changes. Koop > > > > mcl