From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Nov 17 16:24:53 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from camus.cybercable.fr (camus.cybercable.fr [212.198.0.200])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B16CA37B661
	for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4197371 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2000 00:24:46 -0000
Received: from s011.dhcp212-229.cybercable.fr (HELO gits) ([212.198.229.11]) (envelope-sender <clefevre@citeweb.net>)
          by camus.cybercable.fr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <roger@cs.strath.ac.uk>; 18 Nov 2000 00:24:46 -0000
Original-Sender: Cyrille Lefevre <root%no-spam@gits.dyndns.org.invalid>
To: Roger Hardiman <roger@cs.strath.ac.uk>
Cc: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@cybercable.fr>, asami@FreeBSD.ORG,
	ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Adding AUTOMAKE_FLAGS to bsd.port.mk
References: <3A11077A.C31A158A@cs.strath.ac.uk> <wve6hxi4.fsf@gits.dyndns.org>
	<3A12402A.A4D7916E@cs.strath.ac.uk>
X-Face: V|+c;4!|B?E%BE^{E6);aI.[<<r#uCVjK"~Ke!@0vxS/.,wki/c|uVnNV!BA-_gY2sfoGc3
        f{#/$PT>97Zd*>^#%Y5Cxv;%Y[PT-LW3;A:fRrJ8+^k"e7@+30g0YD0*^^3jgyShN7o?a]C
        la*Zv'5NA,=963bM%J^o]C
Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>
In-Reply-To: Roger Hardiman's message of "Wed, 15 Nov 2000 07:50:02 +0000"
From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>
Date: 15 Nov 2000 13:47:57 +0100
Message-ID: <itpp8kqq.fsf@gits.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines: 27
Xref: gits.dyndns.org sent-mail:378
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 378   Wed Nov 15 13:47:58 2000
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Roger Hardiman <roger@cs.strath.ac.uk> writes:

> Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> > 
> > > USE_AUTOMAKE= yes
> > > AUTOMAKE_ARGS += --add-missing.
> > 
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=21903
> 
> I actually found just a few hours before your email.
> So what I planned to do was let the first patch go through
> and then to generate a second patch with the support for
> ACLOCAL.

humm! aclocal already exists, but w/o ACLOCAL_ARGS support.

> I was even thinking of adding in ACHEADER support too as
> I know of 4 ports which call acheader as well.

why not.

in fact, I think every commands found in bsd.ports.mk should have
support for <COMMAND>_ARGS, I'm wrong ?

Cyrille.
--
home: mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message