From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 05:58:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82B01065670; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: from mail.rubicom.hu (mail.rubicom.hu [89.147.80.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3818B8FC13; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.rubicom.hu) by mail.rubicom.hu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KfSrG-0002QG-DC; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:12:14 +0200 Received: from ip5993549e.rubicom.hu ([89.147.84.158] helo=baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx) by mail.rubicom.hu with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KfSrD-0002JP-Cm; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:12:11 +0200 Received: from baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m8G5C48b002401; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:12:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) Received: (from sziszi@localhost) by baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m8G5C4BW002400; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:12:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sziszi@bsd.hu) X-Authentication-Warning: baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx: sziszi set sender to sziszi@bsd.hu using -f Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:12:04 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080916051204.GA1620@baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx> References: <200809142043.m8EKhaOf011973@repoman.freebsd.org> <1221532761.1848.23.camel@wombat.2hip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1221532761.1848.23.camel@wombat.2hip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-drivers/xf86-video-i810 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:58:11 -0000 On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:39:21PM -0400, Robert Noland wrote: > > Is this port still necessary? It would be advisable to remove it > > instead of just marking it broken. The xf86-video-intel driver > > supports all hardware that i810 used to support, AFAICT. In fact it > > installs a symlink i810_drv.so -> intel_drv.so! > > I've been making that argument as well. I expect that either flz@ or I > will remove it soon. It won't build against libdrm-2.3.1 and it's just > plain old code. The intel guys don't touch it anymore and I doubt that > anyone else is going to fix it. That may all be true and good, but at least in the past the intel driver simply refused to work properly with my hardware detected as " on vgapci0" (on a ThinkPad R50e): the picture had distortions in it and it may have even frozen the machine when 3d support was on (I am not sure about the latter). In contrast, the i810 driver "just works" also with 3d support (although it also has problems in that I cannot seem to be able to set the size of the video RAM that the card should use, but that did not affect much so I do not care.) I will try the intel driver if it has become any better in the meantime, but this is just a FYI, I am probably not the only one in this situation. Keep up the good work, guys! -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest Hungary