From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 09:30:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EFE16A41F; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jacques@powertrip.co.za) Received: from prometheus.powertrip.co.za (prometheus.powertrip.co.za [72.21.46.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA64143D49; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:30:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jacques@powertrip.co.za) Received: from prometheus.powertrip.co.za ([72.21.46.202] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by prometheus.powertrip.co.za with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1FKBHi-000Dgr-QR; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:30:16 +0200 Message-ID: <441A819A.5070100@powertrip.co.za> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:30:02 +0200 From: Jacques Marneweck User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Danny Braniss References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scan-Signature: e3795e17a72bf4f0235bf9a8bbd7ceb5 X-Authenticated-Sender: jacques@powertrip.co.za Cc: ozawa@ongs.co.jp, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, 'Daichi GOTO' , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "'Mars G. Miro'" Subject: Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:30:30 -0000 Danny Braniss wrote: >> Daichi GOTO wrote: >> >>> All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions >>> and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :) >>> >> OK. How about a merge? >> >> I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jan Mikkelsen. >> > > just a 'me too'. I've been running with the patch(under 6.1) and it's > definitely > better than the panics with the unpatched version. in other words, > IMHO, it does not break anything, and it actualy fixes somethings. > > danny > Any ETA to when we can see this merged into 6.1 and 5.5? Regards --jm -- Jacques Marneweck http://www.powertrip.co.za/blog/