From owner-cvs-all Thu Jul 5 11:49:10 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from sydney.worldwide.lemis.com (pixpat.austin.ibm.com [192.35.232.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74F737B401; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:49:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by sydney.worldwide.lemis.com (8.11.3/8.9.3) id f65HQmg00565; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:26:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from grog) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:26:48 -0500 From: Greg Lehey To: Kris Kennaway Cc: John Baldwin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_synch.c Message-ID: <20010705122647.K371@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> References: <20010704105848.K1438@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <20010704173943.C296@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <20010704160401.A42306@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010704160401.A42306@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:04:02PM -0700 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 16:04:02 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 05:39:43PM -0500, Greg Lehey wrote: >> On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 13:44:10 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >>> >>> On 04-Jul-01 Greg Lehey wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, 3 July 2001 at 0:53:35 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >>>>> jhb 2001/07/03 00:53:35 PDT >>>>> >>>>> Modified files: >>>>> sys/kern kern_synch.c >>>>> Log: >>>>> Axe spl's that are covered by the sched_lock (and have been for quite >>>>> some time.) >>>> >>>> I still get very confused when people talk about spls in -CURRENT. >>> >>> They are still there even if they are stub functions. I'm just axeing some of >>> the stubs that have been fully replaced. >> >> OK, I can see the point if this is code which can be MFCd. But by the >> looks of it this isn't the case here. So what good does it do? > > You'd prefer we left the NOP code in the tree until the end of time? I'm not sure if you understand. That's what this commit does, sort of. I'm just wondering why. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message