From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Oct 12 10:50:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA14377
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 10:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate.isltd.insignia.com (mailgate.isltd.insignia.com [193.112.16.21])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA14371
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 10:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Address: Insignia Solutions plc., High Wycombe, Bucks, HP11 1JU, UK
X-Telephone: +44 1494 459426
X-Fax: +44 1494 459720
Received: from ferrari.isltd.insignia.com by mailgate.isltd.insignia.com (5.65c8/UK-2.1.ISL) with SMTP
	id AA24618; Sat, 12 Oct 1996 18:50:18 +0100
Received: from 193.112.17.164 (kquinlan-mac) by ferrari.isltd.insignia.com (4.1/UK-2.1.ISL) 
Message-Id: <325FDA79.26C2@isltd.insignia.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 18:50:49 +0100
From: Kevin Quinlan <Kevin.Quinlan@isltd.insignia.com>
Organization: Insignia Solutions plc
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: 2.1.5 and BT946C warning about bt1 during bootup
X-Url: http://www.freebsd.org/support.html
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

Our system here, P100 with Buslogic BT946C PCI SCSI controller with 2 
Seagate drives and a Matshita CDROM.

When the system boots, it probes the PCI bus and finds the BT946C and 
all the drives, and subsequently accesses them correctly (2.1.5 fixes 
a problem that we had here where the kernel could be panic'd by doing 
an "ls -R" on the CDROM, so many thanks for that).

But when the system starts to probe the ISA bus it issues two 
messages:

bt: unit number (1) too high
bt1 not found at 0x330.

It is unclear why the system ever probes for a bt1, the kernel 
configuration has:

controller				bt0		at isa? port "IO_BT0" bio irq ? vector bt_isa_intr

the config utility creates a bt.h with NBT defined to 1, so I can't 
see why it ever looks for a second controller.

Seraching the archive, I have found this question asked once before, 
but no reply. Can anyone shed any light on this for me?

Regards


Kevin Quinlan