From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 14 18:05:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498F416A40F for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:05:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drechsau@Geeks.ORG) Received: from mail.geeks.org (jacobs.Geeks.ORG [204.153.247.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF16743D49 for ; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drechsau@Geeks.ORG) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16F9A15903C; Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:05:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:05:55 -0500 From: Mike Horwath To: Robert Joosten Message-ID: <20061014180555.GB75972@Geeks.ORG> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Joosten , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org References: <20061014130331.68863.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200610141113.25155.tec@mega.net.br> <20061014153813.GC72440@Geeks.ORG> <200610141313.28868.tec@mega.net.br> <20061014162222.GB716@iphouse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061014162222.GB716@iphouse.com> X-PGP-Fingerprint: D8 24 CC E6 47 5F E4 60 BF B7 6E FA BF C7 6E C5 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 6A89 E78A B8B1 69D9 8CDB E966 4A5A C3F9 A1B0 C381 User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:05:56 -0000 On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 06:22:23PM +0200, Robert Joosten wrote: > Hi, > > > but I tell you that a 10K Raptor is faster then a 15K 320Mb SCSI when > > compiling world or untarring large files. > > Well, put that '10K Raptor' in a loaded fileserver and compare it > with a SCSI thing. Most scsi implementations I know are much more > scalable when there's a realworld load sucking it till death. Try it > ;-) Shhh... > Have a great weekend y'all. yahyah, I concur. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG