From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 17 10:48:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA02982 for current-outgoing; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 10:48:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [194.77.0.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02968; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 10:48:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id TAA26495; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 19:45:25 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id HAA01261; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 07:52:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19971117075259.32948@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 07:52:59 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: Penisoara Adrian Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Latest 3.0-SNAP for ISP Production server ? References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: ; from Penisoara Adrian on Mon, Nov 17, 1997 at 01:32:06AM +0200 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, Nov 17, 1997 at 01:32:06AM +0200, Penisoara Adrian wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm sorry to bother you all but I really am out of 'sync' with -current > events... > We have an dual Pentium machine running 3.0-970718-SNAP and we have big > plans for it (it's our main server) so I'd like to 'upgrade' it to the > newest stable SNAP in this time frame, while we're going to do a bunch of > changes in the networking infrastructure. > Beeing our main server I'd like to know what's the latest _stable_ SNAP; > I'm specially looking for stable AIC7XXX (AHA2940AU adapter), MFS, PPP and > networking subsystems. You should use 2.2-STABLE for a production machine. -current is developers playground. It's not recommended to run -current in a production environment. For SMP you should wait, until 3.0-RELEASE comes out. Ok, SMP does pretty well here at home, but if I were you I'd choose -STABLE for the company (as I did twice). -- Andreas Klemm powered by ,,symmetric multiprocessor FreeBSD''