From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 26 08:49:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA26041 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 08:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cnsvax.albany.edu (SYSTEM@cnsvax.albany.edu [169.226.1.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA26036 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 08:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h41.albany.edu (h41.oneida.albany.edu) by cnsvax.albany.edu (PMDF V5.1-8 #18385) with ESMTP id <01II5S1Y8COI8WWDHW@cnsvax.albany.edu> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 11:48:28 EDT Content-return: allowed Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 11:47:06 -0400 From: michael dan wolfe Subject: freeBSD To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-to: mw0102@cnsvax.albany.edu Message-id: <3362237A.81124269@cnsvax.albany.edu> Organization: resnet MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b3 [en] (Win95; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk i'm inquiring because i run win95 and believe that FreeBSD is more stable, and in some cases easier to use (once it's properties are known) it also has many more options, the only problem is, i know nothing about UNIX. would this OS still be a good choice for me at this time, or should i read up on and work with UNIX before i try to use FreeBSD (along with win95 on a dual boot)
-Michael Wolfe