Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:09:06 +0100 From: rank1seeker@gmail.com To: hackers@freebsd.org, "John Baldwin" <jhb@freebsd.org>, "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot) Message-ID: <20120228.200906.958.1@DOMY-PC> In-Reply-To: <201202271123.59244.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20120217.074355.853.1@DOMY-PC> <201202241531.11281.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120225.144148.466.1@DOMY-PC> <201202271123.59244.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: rank1seeker@gmail.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, "Roman Divacky" <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:23:59 -0500 Subject: Re: BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot) > On Saturday, February 25, 2012 9:41:48 am rank1seeker@gmail.com wrote: > > > Do you only see the "No " message? Do you see the '/boot.config: /loader' > > > message? (Do you have RBX_QUIET enabled perhaps? (-q)) Do you get the actual > > > boot2 prompt at all? > > > > I don't have RBX_QUIET enabled nor any other flags > > > > Let the pic tell a story: > > http://www.starforce.biz/stage2boot.jpg > > Ahh, this is helpful. You do see the '/boot.config: /loader' message. I've already explained that, numerous times (RE-typing ...) Image is STILL valid for this latest patch. > > It is also valid for your latest patch > > > > > > > Hmm, I think the problem is that 'opts' has garbage instead of being > > > initialized to zero. > > > > > > Try this (also at www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/boot2_opts.patch): > > > > > > Patch eliminates possible error, of manual "intervention" > > That is, a perfectly valid patch being classified as invalid. > > I have no idea what you mean here. However, it seems you don't have junk in > your 'opts' variable anyway. What I meant was that I won't manually(edit file) apply patch, but via 'patch' tool/bin. > Hmm, you could try adding some more debugging to boot2.c to see exactly what > is failing. For example, does the first call to 'parse()' fail and clear > autoboot? I don't do nor understand c code. > Oh, garbage in cmd[] could be bad. We might read beyond the end of the file. > Try http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/boot2_cmd.patch > > -- > John Baldwin > > ... Ah, 9.0 doesn't have the > /boot/config support. Try www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/boot2_cmd_9.0.patch > > -- > John Baldwin How could it silently loose documented functionality? It still doesn't work, Domagoj Smolčić
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120228.200906.958.1>