From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Apr 25 21:09:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA03453 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 21:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA03448 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 21:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA13337; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 21:08:04 -0700 (PDT) To: Michael Smith cc: tony@dell.com, witr@rwwa.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't put 512MB ram in box ... Extended memory question. In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 26 Apr 1997 13:02:25 +0930." <199704260332.NAA05500@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 21:08:03 -0700 Message-ID: <13334.862027683@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The readfile() stuff in the new bootblocks could read the file in just > after the kernel; would that be good enough? We could stack > userconfig commands into that... Sounds good to me - like I said, it's just writing that file back out that's still giving me conceptual headaches. :-) Jordan