From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Mon Feb 26 20:55:53 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0274AF21595; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A62CF69147; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C5E3F748; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:55:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-240-174.dsl.sil.at [188.118.240.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 989D23F662; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:55:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:55:48 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Adam Weinberger cc: Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r462376 - in head: . emulators emulators/wine-staging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201802200837.w1K8b1QY087980@repo.freebsd.org> <20180220123937.qvahs2zdvvjritel@ogg.in.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:55:53 -0000 On Mon, 26 Feb 2018, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>I did not get any INDEX failure message at all. Not a single one. > Ah, are you perchance not subscribed to ports@? I think the INDEX message only > goes there. Perhaps the script could be improved to Cc everybody on the hook. Yes, that would be great. Actually To:ing those on the hook and Cc:ing ports@ would be my recommendation. (Rationale: Direct mails tend to directly arrive in inboxes, whereas mailing lists often are sorted somewhere else, where it'll be read later.) Gerald