From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Dec 2 13:07:49 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id NAA21472 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 13:07:49 -0800 Received: from casparc.ppp.net (casparc.ppp.net [194.64.12.35]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA21458 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 13:07:39 -0800 Received: from ernie by casparc.ppp.net with uucp (Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tLz4M-000I5hC; Sat, 2 Dec 95 22:02 MET Received: by ernie.altona.hamburg.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0tLy5E-00001dC; Sat, 2 Dec 95 20:58 MET Message-Id: From: hm@altona.hamburg.com (Hellmuth Michaelis) Subject: APM resume not rx'd with 3Com589C in PCMCIA slot To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 20:58:52 +0100 (MET) Reply-To: hm@altona.hamburg.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 769 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On a DEC HiNote 433 notebook APM functions fine as long as i don't plug a 3Com 3C589C into the PCMCIA slot - if i do, and want to APM-resume after a APM-suspend, the display is switched on but nothing more happenes. (compiling with APM_DEBUG defined: without the card i get the suspend and the resume message, with the card i just get the suspend message but no resume message; compiling with APM_SLOWSTART=5 makes no difference if that matters. Ah, and yes, this is still under 2.0.5, but as far as i see its the same code for 2.1). Am i doing something obviously wrong or is it a bug ? hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis hm@altona.hamburg.com Hamburg, Europe (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)nstall BSD ?