Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 11:15:34 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Cc: mheller@student.uni-kl.de, rminnich@sarnoff.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: coda questions Message-ID: <199606031815.LAA25273@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199606021949.OAA00608@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Jun 2, 96 02:49:38 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > what degree of threading does it have? > > > thread per remote computer > > > enough threads to support demand > > > thread per exported object > > > > > and again, are tehse user-level threads (seems so). > > > Reason for asking: depending on how much threading, rfork() may do the job. > > > One of the middle-layer VM enhancements that I plan to add for 2.2 is > true-shared address spaces. Will this help? In this model, what will be the difference between a kernel thread and multiple processes with true-shared address spaces? I am specifically referring to an SVR4/Solaris "LWP" kernel thread. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606031815.LAA25273>