From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Aug 19 16:09:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12098 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 16:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12088 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 1997 16:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA09383; Wed, 20 Aug 1997 09:08:40 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 09:08:40 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Nicholas Merrill cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WinNT to FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19970819160929.0375cc84@calyx.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 19 Aug 1997, Nicholas Merrill wrote: > >There is only one thing holding us back, it is very important that we keep > >track of our users, such as login times and length of login plus how much > >they are downloading per call. > > Actually I heard it wasn't possible to track any information like that > with FreeBSD. That may be the one edge that NT has in this competition. You heard that from some unimaginative non-programmer, I'll bet. See my previous reply. /* Daniel O'Callaghan */ /* HiLink Internet danny@hilink.com.au */ /* FreeBSD - works hard, plays hard... danny@freebsd.org */