From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 19 08:13:26 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A708A1065670;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:13:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.129])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD208FC19;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:13:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it)
Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275)
	id 0214773098; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:18:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:18:43 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20090119081843.GA49607@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References: <49742ADA.5080509@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49742ADA.5080509@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: NTFS in GENERIC: opt-in or opt-out?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:13:27 -0000

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:25:14PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am reviewing differences between amd64 and i386 GENERIC kernels and 
> noticed that for some unclear reason we ship amd64 GENERIC with NTFS 
> module compiled in, while i386 without it. IMHO both should match. The 
> question is whether NTFS should be i386 way (opt in) or amd64 way (opt 
> out) in GENERIC? What do people think?

given that the sysutils/fusefs-ntfs seems to be much better,
I'd rather remove the in-kernel ntfs from both and replace
with a note on what to do to use fusefs-ntfs

cheers
luigi