From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 10:56:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C0B16A41F for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:56:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shearwater@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69D843D49 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:56:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shearwater@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h27so2699016wxd for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 02:56:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jwSVa4RpsOIx10efJD2if/WfbZPhYtxTJsaOe8qVpcReWd6bw0qf3vS+nAFpXx4xEZssmhaJtA328mvP1010tTJN1E5COuYsmxm9vJLAHREfdxgrvt6f4nVu62ld+8cB3kLh807wMoHQP3Kr9+pC+ZxGZfUjvShcWJDEA0UHzhY= Received: by 10.64.220.2 with SMTP id s2mr4199043qbg; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 02:56:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.196.14 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 02:56:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:56:11 +0000 From: Ruan Kendall To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20051129114254.U31139@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051129114254.U31139@chylonia.3miasto.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Zero Channel Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:56:12 -0000 I was rather hoping to be able to boot from a RAID5 array, giving me a safety net in case of disk failure but still giving me effectively 3 disks worth of storage space. Using two RAID1 arrays would be an alternative, but that would mean having less space available. I am uncertain of the perfomance penalties of the ZCR/RAIDIOS setup, though the press releases (but the vendors, naturally) imply that it isn't too serious. As for saturating the PCI bus, I have no immediate use for it, nor do I envisage needing it at any time in the near future. - Ruan On 11/29/05, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > raid card for my Gigabyte SR125E machine. This sort of card does not > > appear to be very widespread, and I have only managed to track down 3 > > candidates; > > > > Adaptec 2020ZCR > > Intel SRCZCRX > > LSI 320-0X > > i don't think is as a good idea, just saturating the bus user to put data > back and forth. software RAID will work better, and cheaper. >