From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu May 28 15:43:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA14578 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lucy.bedford.net (lucy.bedford.net [206.99.145.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA14555 for ; Thu, 28 May 1998 15:43:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from listread@lucy.bedford.net) Received: (from listread@localhost) by lucy.bedford.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA04504; Thu, 28 May 1998 18:31:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from listread) Message-Id: <199805282231.SAA04504@lucy.bedford.net> Subject: Re: Better luck with PPro 166 or 180 at 200 MHz? In-Reply-To: <199805281422.JAA02276@compound.east.sun.com> from Tony Kimball at "May 28, 98 09:22:18 am" To: alk@pobox.com Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 18:31:17 -0400 (EDT) Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-to: djv@bedford.net From: CyberPeasant X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Tony Kimball wrote: > > I'm trying to decide whether to get a pair of 166 or 180 MHz PPro's. > Which has a better probability of running at 200MHz, a pair of > 166MHz 512k cache, or a pair of 180MHz 256k cache? > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message > A pair of 200MHz running at 200MHz is your best bet :) (Sorry, couldn't resist.) Dave -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message