From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  5 20:07:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4E2B916A4CE; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 20:07:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ss.eunet.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8D14E43D39; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 20:07:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mime@traveller.cz)
Received: from localhost.i.cz (ss.eunet.cz [193.85.228.13])
	by ss.eunet.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j35K7UGB066257;
	Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:07:30 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from mime@traveller.cz)
From: Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz>
To: Didier Wiroth <didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu>
In-Reply-To: <9a3eae2e6edd.425309a6@etat.lu>
References: <9a3eae2e6edd.425309a6@etat.lu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 22:07:29 +0200
Message-Id: <1112731649.68302.11.camel@genius2.i.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: delphij@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for
	FreeBSD-CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:07:32 -0000

Didier Wiroth wrote:
> Hello,
> Thank you very much for replying.
> 
> > cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol
> > patch </path/vidcontrol.diff.20050215
> 
> I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today.

> The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives
> some errors.

The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and
compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol sources
on -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity fixes by Xin Li
- probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about.

Michal