From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 14 16:45:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA21714 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tok.qiv.com ([204.214.141.211]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA21706 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tok.qiv.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with UUCP id SAA09875; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 18:45:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost) by acp.qiv.com (8.8.6/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA01267; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 18:34:33 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: acp.qiv.com: jdn owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 18:34:32 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jay D. Nelson" To: Julian Elischer cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Async mounts (Was:Re: FreeBSD is slower than Linux !?) In-Reply-To: <33F287A5.42877E5C@whistle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk You make a good argument. Frankly, I never thought of some of the more useful ways to use async mounts. I stand chastened -- and more knowledgeable. Thanks. -- Jay On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Julian Elischer wrote: >Jay D. Nelson wrote: >> >> My point was simply that when you put both under a real life multiuser >> load, the differences are fairly obvious. And frankly, I wouldn't use >> async mounts for anything other than news. >> >> -- Jay > >I use them for /usr/obj or /usr/src for that matter >(I can always get it back from the cvs tree.) >makes compiles al ot faster.. >I also switch to async mode whenever I have a massive rm -rf to do > >or for restores or unpacking packages and tar files etc.. > -- Jay