Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Aug 1997 18:34:32 -0500 (CDT)
From:      "Jay D. Nelson" <jdn@qiv.com>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Async mounts (Was:Re: FreeBSD is slower than Linux !?)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970814182738.1254A-100000@acp.qiv.com>
In-Reply-To: <33F287A5.42877E5C@whistle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You make a good argument. Frankly, I never thought of some of the more
useful ways to use async mounts. I stand chastened -- and more
knowledgeable. Thanks.

-- Jay

On Wed, 13 Aug 1997, Julian Elischer wrote:

>Jay D. Nelson wrote:
>> 
>> My point was simply that when you put both under a real life multiuser
>> load, the differences are fairly obvious. And frankly, I wouldn't use
>> async mounts for anything other than news.
>> 
>> -- Jay
>
>I use them for /usr/obj or /usr/src for that matter 
>(I can always get it back from the cvs tree.)
>makes compiles al ot faster..
>I also switch to async mode whenever I have a massive rm -rf to do
>
>or for restores or unpacking packages and tar files etc..
>

-- Jay




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970814182738.1254A-100000>