Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:04:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak <matt@atopia.net> To: Dominic Marks <dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Maciej Wierzbicki <voovoos-stable@killfile.pl> Subject: Re: Two Options: which to choose? Message-ID: <20050630200449.K69668@neptune.atopia.net> In-Reply-To: <200507010034.58982.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk> References: <20050630164529.D65760@neptune.atopia.net> <20050630213541.GA26335@mail.media4u.pl> <20050630175234.J67125@neptune.atopia.net> <200507010034.58982.dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Could you not use pfsync to mitigate the problem (at least > partially)? As for your original question, I think its less > work to change your hardware to something you know works than > changing operating systems. Why not use single CPU machines > for this? My boss refuses :-(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050630200449.K69668>