From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 26 18:51:47 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D25616A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:51:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E651243D48
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:51:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8BB7D516F2; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:51:44 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <20050426185144.GA25420@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ule+preempt?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:51:47 -0000


--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 04:15:56AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some months.
> i am wondering if the waters have become relatively safe to go
> to ule with preemption?

No, it can cause panics and is not yet reliable in my testing.

Kris

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCbo3AWry0BWjoQKURAkpsAKDKCJSOR/3ohUrvM1EUMpe+EMrh3wCgglHu
ReGd1rLmH0wheGZX6zSLhwk=
=Y8X4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--