From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 19 19:47:22 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A4AE97;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:47:22 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0908D23C;
 Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:47:21 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:45:33 -0500
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice?
References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com>
 <CADLo83-a7yqkFhgMinGiookjvgtFuTVeGQobOepuHDCeH_wsog@mail.gmail.com>
 <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com>
 <CADLo83-FoLrZGgkDZjjQ-jb-fcZNS3isn-F=zbd9pVkkmXQZUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com>
 <CAJ-Vmok2HFaU4QQHBEaO0iL3HE4pLpA=iFa-xfqQtOk9JewioQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>, office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org,
 Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD <freebsd-office.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-office>,
 <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-office@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>,
 <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:47:22 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-02-19 14:31:02 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 19.02.2013 14:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> What do we go from here?  I don't know.  One thing I know for
>> sure is we cannot support every possible build/runtime
>> environment.
>> 
>> Feel free to suggest your ideas and thoughts.
> Well, support for "every possible" combination is, of course, a
> toll order, but support for the base cc/c++ is a reasonable
> expectation, in my opinion...

Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it
wasn't fruitful.  Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after
kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers anyway. :-(

> And if there is a *good* reason to reject the base compiler, I'd
> expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably with
> bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its toolchain or
> against the LibreOffice code. Or both...

I believe there were plenty PRs already.

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRI9ZdAAoJECXpabHZMqHOetMH+gMVJvAdp9x8jSzqvZQoaw28
fXoyNunlPTMq5U1sBzL1ZURm1nPwSutlAp5dccd4oRWQUXZ5uf09vNP8hI02cXz6
xteVQXtPEYYbkk6ySlpUfCl/Xostr1vkzT1a52KwGK8VHZsV41SXZEEylbBmTRfx
ikoSpwQGBo8M6IpdrI29cfUWriajMSqXGYqNMFsloGj7kJVY/WKSe1OGraPtQMwR
Y61255VJ83tpYo7a0HGSAKEOXCGLNg8cvXNG3F7bz/rP9eikbIvx8CYYWFPQ8IrO
gB7l1Nz4XL0Z5J9jUi/QZ+dl/gM/OthaKH05WkTimmJJvlBfxphWkrELgJUwmPM=
=hTpo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----