From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 12:21:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B3337B401; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from baraca.united.net.ua (vlan1.baraca.united.net.ua [195.234.212.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E6443FCB; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:20:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from max@vega.com) Received: from vega.vega.com (root@xDSL-2-2.united.net.ua [193.111.9.226]) h3EJKpTF011762; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:20:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from max@vega.com) Received: from vega.vega.com (max@localhost.vega.com [127.0.0.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h3EJL6PG023902; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:21:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from max@localhost) by vega.vega.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h3EJL6bs023901; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:21:06 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:21:05 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20030414192105.GB23799@vega.vega.com> References: <20030414190911.GA23799@vega.vega.com> <1050347556.371.50.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1050347556.371.50.camel@gyros> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE i386 cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: Mozilla shouldn't force -O2 optimisation on user X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:21:00 -0000 On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:12:37PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 15:09, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think that every concept of "WITHOUT_OPTIMIZE" added in > > rev.1.136 of ports/www/mozilla/Makefile is wrong. No port > > should force optimisation level on user - we have CFLAGS > > for this and each user should be able to select any > > performance/stability ratio he wants. > > > > IMO relevant part of 1.136 should be backed out, or possibly > > turned into WITH_OPTIMIZED instead. > > It took me a long time to turn this on. Many people asked for it, and > extensive tests showed it helped without any adverse affects. I finally > borrowed the concept from www/phoenix. Tell them about CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf, or about make CFLAGS="-O100" I bet they would be surprised. ;-) -Maxim > > I'm always open to change. What say you all? Should this be reverted? > Turned into WITH_MOZILLA_OPTIMIZE? > > Joe > > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Maxim > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- > Joe Marcus Clarke > FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org > http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome > >