Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 20:12:44 +0200 From: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>, bsddiy@163.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: import NetBSD rc system Message-ID: <20010611201243.B77956@laptop.6bone.nl> In-Reply-To: <200106111800.f5BI0il25446@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:00:43PM -0600 References: <20010611174717.A77956@laptop.6bone.nl> <1795096378.20010611154930@163.net> <3B2484EA.B1F04812@DougBarton.net> <20010611174717.A77956@laptop.6bone.nl> <200106111800.f5BI0il25446@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Can it be called SysV style? Or not seperated in that way? (I must say, the big ugly rc thing is the only thing I don't like about FreeBSD, I'm very much in favor of the SysV style init. But thats another war ;) Mark On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:00:43PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20010611174717.A77956@laptop.6bone.nl> Mark Santcroos writes: > : What is the difference between the present rc scheme and the NetBSD one? > > The NetBSD rc scheme, in a nutshell, put each thing into its own file > and does order dependencies automatically. Ours is one big monolithic > beast that kinda can do extra things, but only if their order can be > coerced into being right. > > Warner -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010611201243.B77956>