From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 23 13:43:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536E737BA5D for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:43:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10837; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:44:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Matthew Dillon , "Rodney W. Grimes" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:47:35 MDT." <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:44:15 -0700 Message-ID: <10834.956522655@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable > branch (yet). FreeBSD usw3.freebsd.org 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #0: Fri Apr 7 01:09:21 CDT 2000 root@usw3.freebsd.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/USW3 i386 If it hasn't been designated stable yet, then a lot of people are being confused every time they run uname(1). :-) It's -stable now. Probably more -stable than 3.x if you look at some people's experiences in the field. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message