From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 18:49:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F0F16A401 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:49:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B3613C46B for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:49:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l29InjMh025904; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:49:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Divacky Roman Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:49:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <45C46416.3020406@melbpc.org.au> <200703091218.39593.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20070309182540.GA85099@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070309182540.GA85099@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703091349.43524.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2786/Fri Mar 9 07:35:44 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, kpeter@melbpc.org.au Subject: Re: linux-2.6.16 emulation: linux-sun-jdk1.6.0 program problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:49:46 -0000 On Friday 09 March 2007 01:25 pm, Divacky Roman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:18:28PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Friday 09 March 2007 05:23 am, Divacky Roman wrote: > > > > >3. Running ftpserver (java application) displays a GUI > > > > > window but terminates abruptly when the server is started > > > > > (syscall epoll_create not implemented). > > > > > > > > epoll* is not implemented. So this is expected (and gives > > > > more priority to epoll). > > > > > > I dont understand why it should use epoll only with 2.6. Epoll > > > has been around for some 5 years now... > > > > I guess Sun didn't think so. Check out: > > ah.. that explains it.. this just means we (I :) ) have to > implement epoll... It will be good to implement epoll() if some critical Java application or class uses java.nio.channels.SelectorProvider. Jung-uk Kim