Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:49:54 +0100
From:      Roger Olofsson <240olofsson@telia.com>
To:        Corey Chandler <lists@sequestered.net>
Cc:        raggen@raggens.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Nerius Landys <nlandys@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Wireless router?
Message-ID:  <495686E2.8090702@telia.com>
In-Reply-To: <495680E9.7070800@sequestered.net>
References:  <560f92640812221349y683a7cbhce8ae0f22a8bedf0@mail.gmail.com>	<4950245D.5090006@telia.com>	<49502764.10405@sequestered.net>	<560f92640812221631l777631eaga00687a7e3dafe77@mail.gmail.com>	<49503F7D.8060805@sequestered.net> <4950EAD1.6070802@telia.com> <495680E9.7070800@sequestered.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Corey Chandler skrev:
> Roger Olofsson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Corey Chandler skrev:
>>> Nerius Landys wrote:
>>>> Thank you all for your suggestions.  This will be a project for me
>>>> over the holidays.  I decided to go the standalone wireless router
>>>> approach.  
>>> Good man!
>>>> I will need to figure out how to configure my standalone
>>>> wireless router to "pass everything through" to the internal LAN that
>>>> I already have.  
>>> It's called "Bridge mode" on most APs-- it does exactly what you 
>>> describe.  Just make sure things like "DHCP server" are turned off or 
>>> you'll see some... odd breakages.
>>>> Also I don't know too much about security, like how
>>>> to prevent eavesdroppers from connecting to my internal network.  One
>>>> of you mentioned access lists, and I assume that means I tell the
>>>> wireless router which MAC addresses it accepts, and nothing else.  
>>> Ugh.  MAC addresses are trivial to spoof-- I usually don't bother 
>>> with using them for security, although I do use 'em to ensure that 
>>> particular machines always inherit particular addresses.
>>>
>>>> Is there any other way to provide security?  Like a password-protected
>>>> network?  What are the buzzwords for these security schemes?  Which
>>>> security scheme do you recommend for preventing random people within
>>>> proximity from connecting to my internal netowrk?
>>>>   
>>>
>>> Absolutely.  Google for WPA or WPA2; WEP has been broken and is 
>>> trivial to bruteforce, so I'd not bother with that.
>>>
>>> Once you get the unit in, feel free to email me off list for 
>>> configuration questions; it sounds like a fun project!
>>>
>>> -- CJC
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus 
>>> Database: 270.10.0/1861 - Release Date: 2008-12-22 11:23
>>>
>>
>> Hello Corey,
>>
>> I don't use 'bridge mode'. I set a normal LAN ip for the wifi router - 
>> as well as ips to the FreeBSD gateway and dns. This is for the LAN 
>> part of the router - then another internal LAN ip for the wifi part.
>>
>> To examplify.
>>
>> Wifi router LAN part - ip 192.168.0.20, gateway 192.168.0.1, dns 
>> 192.168.0.10 and 192.168.0.11.
>>
>> Wifi wifi part - network 10.0.0.1 - 10.0.0.10.
> The problem with doing that is a lot of systems start throwing weird 
> errors in a double NAT environment.   I'd probably avoid that step and 
> restrict wireless to its own VLAN if I were to go that route...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.0/1865 - Release Date: 2008-12-26 13:01
> 


Hello Corey,

There is no double NAT involved.

/Roger




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?495686E2.8090702>