From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 21 12:14:50 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004211065676
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E8B8FC16
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:14:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5LCEkmS002398;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:14:46 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5LCEjR0002395; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:14:46 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+D9QhuOX+Xx47XJBicKB-zVZf588ViXeCa-9ZP7s5p8+TSRaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211414150.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211350250.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+D9QhuOX+Xx47XJBicKB-zVZf588ViXeCa-9ZP7s5p8+TSRaQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:14:46 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:14:50 -0000

> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
> wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>
>> stick with UFS. It JUST WORKS(R), and is trusty.
>> And it works fast.
>>
>>
> The correct answer would be. I depends on the work load....

For different kinds of production workload it doesn't, aat least for me.