From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Mar  9 01:40:11 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA05796
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 01:40:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nike.efn.org (gurney_j@garcia.efn.org [198.68.17.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA05731
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 01:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gurney_j@localhost) by nike.efn.org (8.6.11/8.6.9) id BAA07253; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 01:41:27 -0800
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 01:41:26 -0800 (PST)
From: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@nike.efn.org>
Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: hackers@freebsd.org, Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Subject: seg fault and strlen
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960309013951.7129A-100000@nike.efn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

I'm not sure this is the best place to put it... but is it ok for strlen 
to seg fault your program when you pass a null pointer to it?  just 
wondering... TTYL...

John-Mark

gurney_j@efn.org
http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/
Modem/FAX: (541) 683-6954   (FreeBSD Box)

Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD (unix)