From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 4 17:55:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC8816A4DE for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:55:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287F043D46 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:55:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A841FFDC1 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:55:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 89CEF1FFBB6; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:55:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7924448D6 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:53:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060904175127.F44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20060905022120.19c6d62d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060904172700.W44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Subject: Re: Where is IPSec NAT-T support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:55:11 -0000 On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> It does apply and compile to RELENG_6_1 and RELENG_6 of some days ago >> (unless you do not enable the option after applying the patch). >> At least it did for me. >> I am partly fine with the "does not work" (in all cases). I am >> currently debugging this. > > I should know better to make statements like this and not backup my > claim with hard data :) > > The problem is that after applying the patch and building a kernel, > the kernel build errors out with this: Are you sure this is a clean RELENG_6_1 with the correct patch? MD5 (freebsd6-natt.diff) = 5e7bb5a3203c8959928bf910d5498140 I compiled this on i386 and am64 just a few days ago and everything was fine. Perhaps contact me off-list and we'll post a summary once we found the problem? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT