Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:53:36 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is IPSec NAT-T support? Message-ID: <20060904175127.F44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <d5992baf0609041045s417548e9m732d1c4443a75702@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060905022120.19c6d62d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <d5992baf0609041024q111de4d6t606266cf48b2d67a@mail.gmail.com> <20060904172700.W44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <d5992baf0609041045s417548e9m732d1c4443a75702@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote: > On 9/4/06, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: >> It does apply and compile to RELENG_6_1 and RELENG_6 of some days ago >> (unless you do not enable the option after applying the patch). >> At least it did for me. >> I am partly fine with the "does not work" (in all cases). I am >> currently debugging this. > > I should know better to make statements like this and not backup my > claim with hard data :) > > The problem is that after applying the patch and building a kernel, > the kernel build errors out with this: Are you sure this is a clean RELENG_6_1 with the correct patch? MD5 (freebsd6-natt.diff) = 5e7bb5a3203c8959928bf910d5498140 I compiled this on i386 and am64 just a few days ago and everything was fine. Perhaps contact me off-list and we'll post a summary once we found the problem? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060904175127.F44392>