From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 7 06:12:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A195F106566C for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 06:12:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chinsan.tw@gmail.com) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A128FC13 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 06:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chinsan.tw@gmail.com) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d27so596561tid.3 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:12:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RerNwIc74rbZWCegNRmEojwov6m73r8m3Ocm67m2oZc=; b=nzAViwditm7nmXagxt1zCrAvKSSrANXvWePi+HfjkIKqAgLAIkA1QeOjnhe3oe9EeQ uTcgADOERT/fn6zxpmGiEqA4Yc6Vqd1vCgLyHIAflpB0MbJaYSC5yCjIdtDq/H8BwEK1 tEAhuVyp+TTYTQg7BQBYY9HfRgJxSeoVsb+nQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=K3rhSYxg5QONEVWj1WFVrejVStagz06y3vcuey/TJM9Ao4PMX52XRDQVQ5Yoib+1Mz LvFUUGRH1DZFJONivqo/gJawCHYNxi1shrGqNP9V4Ypv+7HzMFyVAyE+1fMOaU2ngaYl RfzgkWWbTYHC/8Xgi4EeGGKBktPxPEZTSVklw= Received: by 10.110.109.12 with SMTP id h12mr17846088tic.51.1220767932960; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.110.63.8 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Sep 2008 23:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1f27304c0809062312x7656c379gcd994be9fc0ca3e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 14:12:12 +0800 From: chinsan To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20080906.235633.-267228782.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080906.224018.-1303464793.imp@bsdimp.com> <1f27304c0809062222m724603dat2fb1af63dba5faa6@mail.gmail.com> <20080906.235633.-267228782.imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pax in /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 06:12:14 -0000 On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:56 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <1f27304c0809062222m724603dat2fb1af63dba5faa6@mail.gmail.com> > chinsan writes: > : On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:40 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > Is there any reason to continue to include both tar and pax in > : > /rescue? > : > > : Maybe for rescue some important file? > > tar can read all the formats that pax can read. Why the duplication > in functionality? Oh, you are right. :p > > : BTW, could editors/e3 be include into /rescue? > : I think it's ineed to have a text editor to edit some file for rescue. > : Because vi(1) lives in /usr/bin. > > /rescue already has nvi. But nvi needs terminfo(5), so it needs to mount /usr filesystem too.