Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 23:39:45 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r297326 - head/sys/nfs Message-ID: <56FFE7C1.2030904@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201603272316.u2RNGbwi018381@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201603272316.u2RNGbwi018381@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/03/2016 7:16 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: > The theory here is that since we can only have one default route, the one > most likely to be correct for mounting the rootfs is the one that was > delivered along with the rootpath option. We can have multiple default routes with weights, and we can have different default routes in different fibs. since interfaces can have fibs assigned to them you need to install the new default if it is useable in the fib of the interface. This is complicated and most companies that use these features have special code to do it.. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56FFE7C1.2030904>