From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org  Tue Feb 27 00:44:06 2018
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C4FF3148F
 for <freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net)
Received: from mail.karels.net (mail.karels.net [216.160.39.52])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29E47571D;
 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@karels.net)
Received: from mail.karels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.karels.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w1R0hxZB071486;
 Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:43:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mike@karels.net)
Message-Id: <201802270043.w1R0hxZB071486@mail.karels.net>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
From: Mike Karels <mike@karels.net>
Reply-to: mike@karels.net
Subject: Re: ps output line length change
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:59:24 -0800.
 <3369243.YQvd3VYPi2@ralph.baldwin.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <71484.1519692239.1@mail.karels.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:43:59 -0600
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:44:06 -0000

jhb wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 21, 2018 02:47:15 PM Cy Schubert wrote:
> > Iirc cem@ committed the original patch. Maybe someone should ask him t=
o revert.

> Mike has.  This thread is to determine what the consensus is.

> My preference is for the old behavior.

Everyone who expressed an opinion about reversion of r314685 on arch@
said that they prefered the old behavior.  There were similar results
on the committers list earlier.  Accordingly, I have put a change
that reverts r314685 and adds comments explaining the old behavior
up for review.  It is https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14530.

		Mike