From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 25 14:50:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD121065678 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7D48FC20 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1PEo1j8046198 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1PEo1wI046192; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:50:01 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201002251450.o1PEo1wI046192@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Alex Keda Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94FD106564A for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:40:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A833D8FC23 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1PEeGnP070938 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:40:16 GMT (envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1PEeG2s070931; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:40:16 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <201002251440.o1PEeG2s070931@www.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:40:16 GMT From: Alex Keda To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-3.1 Cc: Subject: misc/144285: ps -axo user, %cpu, %mem - most processes using 0% of memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:50:01 -0000 >Number: 144285 >Category: misc >Synopsis: ps -axo user,%cpu,%mem - most processes using 0% of memory >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Feb 25 14:50:00 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Alex Keda >Release: 7.2-STABLE >Organization: USSR >Environment: FreeBSD srv2.host-food.ru 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0: Sun Oct 4 01:38:34 MSD 2009 lissyara@srv.host-food.ru:/home/obj/usr/src/sys/HOST-FOOD i386 >Description: Modern computers have a large amount of memory. But, in ps(1) source I see: (void)printf("%*.1f", v->width, getpcpu(k)); (void)printf("%*.1f", v->width, getpmem(k)); 0.1% - it very big. for 8Gb ram it = 8mb Many of the processes is less than this number. >How-To-Repeat: ps -axo user,%cpu,%mem >Fix: see patch Patch attached with submission follows: --- /usr/src/bin/ps/print.c.orig 2010-01-22 23:09:53.000000000 +0300 +++ /usr/src/bin/ps/print.c 2010-01-22 23:10:06.000000000 +0300 @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ VAR *v; v = ve->var; - (void)printf("%*.1f", v->width, getpcpu(k)); + (void)printf("%*.2f", v->width, getpcpu(k)); } static double @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ VAR *v; v = ve->var; - (void)printf("%*.1f", v->width, getpmem(k)); + (void)printf("%*.2f", v->width, getpmem(k)); } void >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: