From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 4 20:18:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E3E106566B; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A4E8FC08; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 99D171E00371; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 22:18:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from triton8.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n84JYZj5077745; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:34:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@triton8.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n84JYZeq077744; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:34:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:34:35 +0200 To: Juergen Lock Message-ID: <20090904193435.GA77708@triton8.kn-bremen.de> References: <20090829222339.GA93608@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <20090902175621.GA63905@triton8.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090902175621.GA63905@triton8.kn-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: experimental FreeBSD qemu-devel git head port update for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:18:22 -0000 On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:56:21PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:23:39AM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Jan Kiszka asked me if the unstable guest timer irq problem still > > exists on qemu git head, so I made an update for that today: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20090829.patch > > (and found out it does.) > > > > The bad news (for FreeBSD users anyway) is kqemu support has now been > > removed as `promised' (by the upstream qemu developers), so testing this > > version is probably less interesting for many FreeBSD users than the > > qemu 0.11 stable branch snapshot I posted about here, > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2009-August/006646.html > > but e.g. users of non-x86 targets probably will still be interested. > > > > Also the pcap patch stopped working in this snapshot and I don't yet > > know why. (I think the original version of that patch was submitted by > > Jung-uk Kim, maybe he has an idea; Cc'd.) > > [...] > > Jung-uk Kim sent me a new pcap patch (thanx! :), and I have just included > it in the mentioned update at > http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20090829.patch New update at the same place, Jung-uk Kim sent me another version of the pcap patch and while I was at it I added the tap close patch and removed the dynticks patch since it seems to perform even worse than -clock unix on FreeBSD. :( Happy testing... Juergen