From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 07:10:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E31416A4CE for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:10:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D6943D2F for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:10:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (ml@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8H7CTaF018576; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:12:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ml@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ml@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8H7CTNR018575; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:12:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ml) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 10:12:29 +0300 From: Alexey Zelkin To: Greg Lewis Message-ID: <20040917071229.GA18547@phantom.cris.net> References: <14C413EDD4FDAB48924086C19BF44F872E053C@MUCS040151.munich.munichre.com> <20040917054616.GA16333@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040917054616.GA16333@misty.eyesbeyond.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: Bevin Michael - Munich-MR - external cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JDK 1.5 / 5.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:10:35 -0000 On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:46:16PM -0600, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Bevin Michael - Munich-MR - external wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the reply. As I understand it there are typically both native ports of the JDK, plus ports which are based on the linux JDK release using the Linux compatibility. Are both these dependent on the SCSL sources, or just the native port? > > Just the native port. However, the beta of the Linux 1.5 in the tree fails > to run at all. So it looks like we'll be SOOL on that front. > > This is potentially going to cause a bootstrap problem unless the 1.5.0 > release is bootstrappable with 1.4. Actually it should not. JDK releases are able to be bootstraped with previous JDK release. When I was expirementing with jdk 1.5.0 this spring, I was able to use jdk 1.4.2 to bootstrap.