From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 12 19:50:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9C937B423 for ; Sat, 12 May 2001 19:50:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD4210F40F; Sat, 12 May 2001 21:50:24 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <01c201c0db57$7273c000$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Patrick Li" , References: <01b601c0db3c$5b02ba40$931576d8@inethouston.net> <002d01c0db41$70cdda30$0200a8c0@bsod> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 21:50:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org samba20 and samba22 has been proposed, byt some people are rejecting it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Li" To: "David W. Chapman Jr." ; Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:12 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > how about samba20 and samba22 and change description in pkg-descr to not > confuse people. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David W. Chapman Jr." > To: "John Polstra" ; "Ade Lovett" > Cc: ; ; > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 7:36 PM > Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 > > > > So how do we have both ports exist without confusing people by keeping > samba > > 2.2.0 as samba devel, because I've gotten a few emails about people > > wondering about its stability. > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message