From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 2 09:29:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA16929 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 09:29:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from venus.net (venus.net [205.243.72.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA16923 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 09:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lostfork (ve1-p2.venus.net [205.243.75.5]) by venus.net (8.7.1/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA15456; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 12:33:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 12:29:16 -0500 (EST) From: Andre LeClaire X-Sender: leclaire@lostfork Reply-To: Andre LeClaire To: Timothy Brown cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: timezone stuff (2.2-BETA) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2 Jan 1997, Timothy Brown wrote: > Question: > > Windows 95 boots up. It tells me the time is proper (9am or whatever). > FreeBSD boots up. It has the CST timezone installed, so it interprets the > time at, like, 2am or something. > > The question is (and I know this is an easy hack, humour me): is this the > intended behaviour? > > If I was just running FreeBSD, this would be fine, but i'm not... I know I > can always hack out the timezone stuff, or just install GMT... > > Am I making any sense? > > Tim > > -- > Timothy Brown, Web Architect/Network Engineer, ANET-STL > Affiliation given for identification, not representation. > http://www.anet-stl.com/~tbrown/ > > I had this problem after upgrading from 2.2-ALPHA to 2.2-BETA.I guess it's one of the things the upgrade part of sysinstall isn't "intelligent" enough to do. For details, man adjkerntz. su cd /etc touch wall_cmos_clock