From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 21 23:12:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A491C1065670 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mckusick@mckusick.com) Received: from chez.mckusick.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:5a8:4:7e72:4a5b:39ff:fe12:452]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DC88FC13 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chez.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chez.mckusick.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBLNCj2a054427; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:12:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mckusick@chez.mckusick.com) Message-Id: <201112212312.pBLNCj2a054427@chez.mckusick.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:12:45 -0800 From: Kirk McKusick X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_MID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chez.mckusick.com Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Dieter BSD Subject: Re: Maximum blocksize for FFS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:12:58 -0000 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= > Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:50:05 +0100 > Subject: Re: Maximum blocksize for FFS? > To: Kirk McKusick > Cc: Dieter BSD , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org > X-ASK-Info: Message Queued (2011/12/14 03:50:37) > X-ASK-Info: Confirmed by User (2011/12/14 04:45:07) > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Kirk McKusick wrote: > > The default blocksize in FreeBSD 9.0 is 32K/4K. We have been > > running with this size in -current for a almost a year with no > > reported problems. > > Hi, > > There is a reported problem: > The number of inode was divided by two with FreeBSD 9.0 (PR > bin/162659) and this create some problems because "the number of > fragments per inode (NFPI) was not adapted to the new default block > size" (Bruce Evans'explanation [1]). > > Regards, > > Olivier > > [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2011-December/046713.html Thanks for bringing your report to my attention. I have applied the suggested change (reducing NFPI from 4 to 2) so as to keep the default number of inodes for a 32K/4K filesystem the same as were created on a 16K/2K filesystem. Kirk McKusick