Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:35:33 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, George Katsanos <gkatsanos@gmail.com>, Frank Staals <frankstaals@gmx.net>, questions@freebsd.org, "Jack L." <xxjack12xx@gmail.com> Subject: Re: KDE Konqueror:Can i have konqueror without KDEstuff port Message-ID: <200511110635.39665.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <ab581e310511091239i5df7c60do6f6ba4a0e0d6edb6@mail.gmail.com> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAAwDSDOzhsU2rBtGtW4YaQsKAAAAQAAAAsX7319CI50%2Bf5uN/kLBz9gEAAAAA@gmail.com> <43720CCD.1060200@gmx.net> <ab581e310511091239i5df7c60do6f6ba4a0e0d6edb6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1593154.9u9Uesul4n Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 9. November 2005 21:39, Jack L. wrote: > I have the same setup, except I only want konsole and konqueror for file > browsing and a terminal. I wonder if kde will ever split up those > applications into different pieces. Most probably never - KDE tries to make a desktop environment, not a browse= r=20 and a terminal emulator. If there's a trend, then it's rather towards tight= er=20 integration instead. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1593154.9u9Uesul4n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDdC2rXhc68WspdLARAhWoAKCKipoxdtSP3Zwfq0gaRjj4Cwkh+gCfaDw7 tHYpKeLFEbSQyooz0U+jjc0= =upAx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1593154.9u9Uesul4n--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511110635.39665.lofi>